American (women's) tennis well is running dry

Tennis Betting Lines

08/18/2010 - Philadelphia, PA (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - If you've been wondering if there's an American woman out there not named Serena Williams or Venus Williams that has a shot at winning a major title in the near future, well, you probably don't have to worry about it.

American tennis, especially at the WTA level, appears to be in a free fall. Just last week, the U.S. failed to place a player in the men's top 10 for the first time since the computer rankings were introduced way back in 1973, as top-10 fixture Andy Roddick dropped out for the first time in four years.

But I'm concerned about the American women in this particular article, as the mighty Williams sisters continue to be the only ones who are producing anything on the ladies' tour.

Serena is currently the standing world No. 1, which is no surprise considering she's the reigning Wimbledon and Aussie Open champ, and Venus is ranked fifth in the world and is a former No. 1. Serena boasts 13 Grand Slam singles titles, while Venus checks in with seven. That's 20 between 'em.

And that's awesome.

But after Serena and Venus, it gets pretty ugly in the contiguous 48, with Melanie Oudin (44th) coming in as the only other top-50 American. And the next-highest American woman after Oudin would be Vania King, who checks in at No. 79.

Oof.

And guess what? There are no more American women inside the top 100 after King, who is a non-factor out there. At least the spry Oudin reached a U.S. Open quarterfinal in dramatic fashion last year, stunning a bevy of Russian stars, in come-from-behind fashion, along the way.

But the 18-year-old Oudin hasn't done much on the circuit since then, and still has yet to title as a member of the WTA Tour. She failed to get past the second round at this year's first three major events, including head- shaking opening-round exits at both the Oz and French Opens.

And King (who certainly is no Billie Jean King)? Fugetaboutit! She's only ever reached the third round at a Grand Slam event once (which occurred at last year's U.S. Open). She's been a first- or second-round loser at 16 other major tournaments.

But King (Vania King), unlike Oudin, has at least titled once on the circuit (four years ago in Bangkok).

Minnesota native Bethanie Mattek-Sands, who beat her Fed Cup teammate Oudin at a tournament in Montreal just this week, is just outside the top 100, at No. 101. Which means there are only four American women inside the top 100!

Yuck.

Thank goodness we (USA) still have Serena and Venus out there, otherwise we'd be watching a whole lot of American-less women's tennis.

The last American woman not named Serena or Venus to capture a major title was Jennifer Capriati at the 2002 Aussie Open. And you'd have to dip into the '90s to come up with a non-Williams American winner at Wimbledon and the U.S. Open, as Lindsay Davenport was the last to turn the trick at the All England Club, in 1999, and in New York, in 1998.

And Serena is the only American woman to capture our national title -- the U.S. Open -- over the last eight years.

And when's the last time an American not named Serena or Venus finished a season inside the top 10? Well that would be Davenport back in 2005, a year in which Lindsay finished No. 1.

Heck, in 2006 there were zero American women inside the top 10 at year's end.

Whatever happened to the good old days when American-born women dominated the top-10 landscape? Like in 1980, for instance, when five of the top 10 hailed from the U.S., including the top-two ladies in the world, Chrissie (Evert, that is) and Tracy Austin.

Will we ever see five American women inside the top 10 again? I seriously doubt it, considering how popular tennis has become all over the globe in the last quarter-century.

What's the (tennis) world coming to when there are more Belgians in the top 20 (Kim Clijsters, Justine Henin and Yanina Wickmayer) than there are Americans (Serena and Venus)?

BELGIUM?

My native Pennsylvania, alone, is almost four times the size of Belgium.

The Russians, as a whole, dominated in recent years, but they're starting to cool off, with only one player, Elena Dementieva, residing inside the top 10 for the time being. But they certainly spread it around (in terms of success), with the likes of Dementieva, Maria Sharapova, Svetlana Kuznetsova, Dinara Safina, Vera Zvonareva, and even Anastasia Myskina. Three of those women have corralled major titles; two have reached No. 1; and all have played in at least one major final.

Sure, the Williams sisters are still here, and the younger one is still a dominant force on tour, but Serena and Venus aren't going to be around forever, and the United States needs to produce at least one woman who can challenge for a top-10 spot sooner rather than later. And that woman currently does not exist (sorry, Oudin), although some have been starting to hype Coco Vandeweghe in recent weeks, despite the fact that the 18-year-old has yet to accomplish anything in "The Show."

By the way, Vandeweghe is the niece of former NBA star/executive/coach Kiki Vandeweghe.

About five years ago, California's Alexa Glatch was a "promising" American.

Was she?

Five years later...she stinks (as far as potential Grand Slam winners go).

Did You Know?: Venus has never finished as season as a year-end No. 1. And Serena's only accomplished the feat twice.

At the upcoming U.S. Open, Serena will certainly be among the favorites, as she always is. Venus...not so much. Oudin...an extreme longshot at best. And King (Vania King) and Mattek-Sands? Not in this or any other lifetime.

Dear USTA, It's time to get back to work!

Wwwibetcasino Tennis Betting News

<< Philadelphia Eagles 2010 Season Preview
(Sportsbook Betting Lines) - In a league where parity reigns supreme, the Philadelphia Eagles have stood out as an enviable model of consistent excellence over the past decade, capturing eight postseason berths, five NFC East titles and conference Champi

<< Tigers disable Guillen again
Bronx, NY (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Detroit Tigers infielder Carlos Guillen has been placed on the 15-day disabled list with a deep bruise in his left knee. Guillen was just activated off the DL on August 9 after being sidelined for just over

<< Gaming: Big Ten snaps three-year ATS losing streak
Philadelphia, PA (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - The Big Ten finished above .500 against the spread in non-conference play last year for the first time since the 2005 season. After going 57-71-1 record (45% winning percentage) over the previous three years

<< Rangers bring up P Holland
St. Petersburg, FL (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - The Texas Rangers recalled pitcher Derek Holland from Triple-A Oklahoma City on Wednesday, in time to start the finale of a three-game series against the Tampa Bay Rays at Tropicana Field. Holland last

<< Almirola to drive for JR Motorsports
Concord, NC (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Aric Almirola has signed a multi-year contract to drive the No. 88 car for JR Motorsports on the Nationwide circuit, starting next year. Almirola has 32 career Nationwide Series starts, including a third

Diamondbacks reinstate Gutierrez from DL >>
Phoenix, AZ (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - The Arizona Diamondbacks reinstated pitcher Juan Gutierrez from the 15-day disabled list on Wednesday. The 27-year-old right-hander had been sidelined since August 3 when he landed on the DL with inflamm

'Quakes Cannon suffers broken ankle >>
Santa Clara, CA (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - San Jose Earthquakes goalkeeper Joe Cannon is expected to miss the next six to eight weeks after he sustained a broken ankle in training. Cannon spent the past six games on the bench before he recorded

Arsenal's Nasri to miss one month with knee injury >>
London, England (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Arsenal midfielder Samir Nasri will be sidelined for a month following knee surgery. Nasri played the full 90 minutes of Sunday's season opening 1-1 draw with Liverpool but picked up a minor knee

Bears agree to terms with QB Gutierrez, DB Webster >>
Lake Forest, IL (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - The Chicago Bears agreed to terms with quarterback Matt Gutierrez and defensive back Aaron Webster on Wednesday. Gutierrez received a one-year contract, while Webster got a two-year deal. Financial

Ankle problem sidelines Kolarov >>
Manchester, England (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Manchester City could be without Aleksandar Kolarov for a number of weeks after revealing the full back has an ankle ligament injury. The Serbian made his debut in Saturday's season opening

Sportsbooks to bet on football

Recently I had an email debate with an angry reader who said I did not understand "the science of oddsmaking", as he called it.

He said I was wrong for suggesting oddsmakers care about who wins or loses games.

"Oddsmakers only care about splitting the betting public 50/50 on both sides of the line and keeping the commission (a.k.a. juice)," he wrote.

He might have been right about not understanding "the science of oddsmaking". After all, I'm not an oddsmaker. That said, I stick to my assertion that oddsmakers (a.k.a. sportbooks) often do care about who wins games.

Granted, as a general rule, sportsbooks try to balance their action so that they're not exposed to big losses. However, there are times when this is difficult to pull off, regardless of how much a line has moved. There are also times when that general rule is ignored and a book pursues risk.

Generally speaking, it's safe to say the books in Vegas are risk-adverse. Unlike in the past when the wise guys ruled the town, Vegas is now corporate and the goal of most casinos is to make as much money as possible with as little risk as possible.

Thus, Vegas sportsbooks try everything in their power to balance the action. They're satisfied simply collecting the juice. But these profits are small, especially compared to the take from other casino games, namely slot machines.

Because the profits at Vegas sportsbooks are so small, you could argue that many casinos operate sportsbooks simply as a novelty to keep the tourists happy.

With a growing aversion to risk, it should come as no surprise that Vegas bookmakers have been panicking this NFL season.

Despite huge pointspreads, a disproportionate percentage of bettors are still laying their money on favorites like the Eagles, Colts, Pats and Vikings rather than the dogs (a common trend for the largely recreational bettors that visit Vegas).

And much to the dismay of the books, those favorites are finding ways to cover the thick chalk. In fact, prior to Week 7, the four teams listed above are a combined 16-2-2 (88 percent) against the spread. (The tables turned dramatically in Week 7, but more on that later.)

The result has been an early-season beating for the books, and a bonanza for bettors.

While Vegas increasingly hates risk, it's no longer a major player in the sports betting world. Most of the betting action now takes place offshore where sportsbooks are not as obsessed about balance. In fact, some books encourage exposure to risk because the rewards can be so much bigger.

Consider MySportsbook.com. On its website, the book has odds pages which actually display the amount of action it's getting on games. In other words, you can see how much action the book is taking on both sides of a pointspread, moneyline or over/under.

One look at these numbers and it's obvious MySportsbook.com does not balance every game. In fact, far from it.

Take last weekend's matchup between St. Louis and Miami. By game time on Sunday, 83 percent of the betting action at MySportsbook.com was on the Rams; only 17 percent was on Miami.

What's interesting is that MySportsbook.com opened the pointspread with Miami at +6 1/2. By game time, the spread had lowered to +5.

That goes contrary to the balancing theory. If MySportsbook.com had wanted to balance the action, it would have given Miami more points; instead, it took away 1 1/2. World Series odds are now up as well.

MySportsbook.com exposed itself to even more to risk, and rolled the dice on the underdog Dolphins. Why? I contacted a representative with the book to find out. His answer was simple.

"The line moved early based on 'smart money' from sharp players," said Jeff Gilroy, a spokesperson for the book. "We also knew from early in the week that we would need Miami, therefore (we dropped) the spread to encourage Rams money.

"At the end of the day, we liked the home team."

So the conclusion is this: MySportsbook.com respected the sharp action, and gambled that the sharp bettors had a better take on the game than the recreational bettors, who were hammering the visiting Rams.

In the end, the gamble paid off. Miami, desperate for a win in front of its home fans, pounded the overrated Rams, who are terrible on the road and even worse on grass. Final score: 31-14 Fish.

MySportsbook.com was also heavily exposed on numerous favorites in Week 7, including Philadelphia, Seattle and Denver. All three failed to cover.

The fact that sportsbooks are exposed to risk on certain games is really nothing new. The fact, that Sportsbook.com is willing to show the public where it's exposed is intriguing.

Armed with this type of information, bettors can make more educated wagers. They can get an idea where the sharp money is going and conversely where the public money is headed.

MySportsbook.com is opening up its cashbox, letting bettors look inside and challenging them to take their best shot at grabbing the cash.

To visit this online football betting got to MySportsbook.com for all your football betting odds needs. Mysportsbook.com online sportsbook accepts Visa and Mastercard credit cards.